× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: mi access to a dtaara
  • From: "Dennis Lovelady" <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:08:16 -0400

I've been watching this thread with interest, and sometimes mild amusement.

This one, I find ... a little amusing.

You will note that MS does not provide access to absolutely everything
within the OS.  There is a selected set of objects that are accessible by
the .NET approach.  Unless and until MS provides access to absolutely every
object in the OS, your analogy is not valid.

This is innovative?!?!  Isn't this accomplished by simply providing header
files for the objects they choose to make "manageable" or "public" or
whatever?  Is this somehow different from the IBM API approach?  What's new
here?
--
Dennis Lovelady             Fayetteville, GA
mail: dennis@lovelady.com
URL:  http://www.lovelady.com
ICQ:  5734860
--
"If you become a star, you don't change, everyone else does."
        - Kirk Douglas


----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@AutoCoder.com>
To: <MI400@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: mi access to a dtaara


> thanks for the feedback.
>
> Any response that does not repeat itself now goes down the "should os/400
> provide the 2nd level api's that many shops wind up writing or using
> taatools for" path.  I vote YES and will leave it at that.
>
> Now if anyone wants to discuss the microsoft .NET approach ....
>
> .NET provides a class and member function interface to the os. To relate
it
> to my data area issue, the os would provide a DataArea class. The class
then
> has member functions like Crt, Dlt, Rtv, Chg, Lock, ...  All programs that
> run on a windows .NET pc have access to the class.  Not bad for a company
> that critics say does not innovate.
>
> -Steve Richter
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
dr2@cssas400.com
> +---
>
>


+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.