They are both running java 1.8.0 32 bit
Thanks for the suggestion
John
-----Original Message-----
From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard Schoen
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:40 AM
To: java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Java performance qshell javac
64-bit instead of 32-bit JVM being called on one of the partitions ?
64-bit startup and speed always was slower.
Not sure if that's improved but someplace to look.
Regards,
Richard Schoen
Web:
http://www.richardschoen.net
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:54:57 -0500
from: "John Allen" <jallen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: Java performance qshell javac
I inherited the encryption process (using the java program) as it was
written a while ago and is used in several places.
The performance issue was handed to me to speed up. I was hoping to find the
reason is so much slower on an almost identical partition So that I don't
have to open a whole big project for replacing the current process.
But I may have to go this route if I don't find a solution.
Thanks for your thoughts Jack.
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
midrange.com
