JIT vs. CRTJVAPGM? -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: JIT vs. CRTJVAPGM?
From: "Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0500
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

 >> Anyone know of benchmarks that compare using the JIT optimization vs.
CRTJVAPGM?

My understanding is that in many cases the JIT now outperforms CRT..  I
reviewed an article for iSeries Magazine written by a couple of Rochester
developers a while back that explained why.  I can't recall when it was
published - some time in 2002 I think.

Looked it up - you can find it here:
http://www.eservercomputing.com/iseries/articles/index.asp?id=320

Jon Paris
Partner400

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.