Re: RE: WDSC and Linux

CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>Every single programmer should have at least one year in which
>they write in some sort of machine language and develop a small, working
>operating system from scratch.  And fit it into 8K.

I'm not going to argue with you, Joe, but I suspect that by this
definition very few of us are "programmers". You set a high bar.

Using your definition, I bet most of us are "application assemblers".  But
 I'm not sure there's anything wrong with that. For one thing, I think
even programming in machine language can be considered "assemblers" --
they're just assembling a lot more pieces that are all a lot smaller. For
another, I think practical reality drives most of us to understand the
tools and components we use in our assemblies at differing levels: some we
understand thoroughly, and some we we know just enough about to understand
 how to use them effectively.

In fact, isn't that the point of encapsulation? You don't have to have a
clue as to what that darn object is doing on the inside -- all you have to
know is what messages you need to send it and what messages to expect
back. Now, that's not going to stop some of us from cracking apart those
objects to see what makes them tick, but it is really required that we do
so before we use them?

Mike Naughton
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Judd Wire, Inc.
124 Turnpike Road
Turners Falls, MA  01376
413-863-4357 x444
mnaughton@xxxxxxxxxxxx