RE: TurnOver integration

Jon,

Mark Phippard at Softlanding and Eric Simpson at IBM determined that the
cause of the problem is a size limitation in Win9x that prevents the full
creation command from being passed from Code to the /400.  No one at
Softlanding had been aware of this difference between WinNT and Win9x
before, but now they have a test machine set up with Win98.  Mark took a
suggestion that I made about trimming the length of the command to be passed
and built a work-around for the limitation, which involves a "short-form"
TurnOver compile command on the /400 and a modified turnmake.lx macro on the
PC.  This has been working very well for me.

I don't know if there's anything IBM can do about the limitation other than
document it, since it's caused by a Microsoft design limitation.  I need to
get our system administrator here to add me to our contact list with IBM so
I can report this problem and get an official response.

Thanks for responding!

Dave Shaw
Spartan International, Inc.
Spartanburg, SC

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Erickson [mailto:jerickson@800.com]

I'm not sure if this applicable,... have you verified the Session Defaults
in Turnover to specify the following? 
Code communications library . . . *USRPRF    *USRPRF, Name 
Code server name  . . . . . . . . *DFT       *DFT, Name   
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to use Code/400 with Turnover.  I imagine
the macro would possibly need some modification based upon which server name
you're using.
+---
| This is the CODE/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to CODE400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to CODE400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to CODE400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: larry@paque.net
+---