×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Seems that the ILE C compiler does not bother with the missing inline on
the prototype: no error or warning on compilation.
But I still have to use the "old" C89 style inline keyword "__inline"
instead of just "inline". Is there a compile option to use the newer
keyword definition "inline"?
Thanx
Mihael
-----Original Message-----
From: c400-l-bounces+mihael.schmidt=rossmann.de@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:c400-l-bounces+mihael.schmidt=rossmann.de@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Amos
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:38 PM
To: C programming iSeries / AS400
Subject: Re: [C400-L] problem with inline function
Sorry that I didn't notice this before. Your prototype does not include
the inline keyword. The ILE C/C++ compiler is extremely picky about
these specification requirements whereas most other compilers either
issue a miner warning or nothing at all (which is not compliant). Change
your prototype to
inline int add_value(int x, int y);
and your implementation to
inline int add_value(int x, int y)
{
return x + y;
}
This implements all of my recommended changes.
Mike
Hi,
I got a little problem with inlining a function in the following
example code:
// Prototypes
int add_value(int x, int y);
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int returnValue = 0;
int x = 2;
int y = 0;
int z = add_value(x, y);
return returnValue;
}
static inline int add_value(int x, int y)
{
return x + y;
};
If i try to compile this I get:
midrange.com
