Re: RPG Programming Question

again i'm not an expert! but my experience has always been with qtemp on the 
bottom of the library list.

but my more major concern is what is he going to put into qtemp/ objects that 
you put in qtemp are accessible only by the job that put them there and they 
are deleted when that job ends. for example, if he was working on a report 
program change he would have to compile the program to qtemp. but if the 
compile was done in batch, you could not access the program via an interactive 
session, or via another batch job.

why not create a test library for him, have him put his objects in his library, 
add his library to the library list, and test them?

somehow, qtemp does smell right, but then again, i don't know the specifics of 
what he is trying to do.


>>> Mrogers@miwheel.com 10/19/00 12:27PM >>>
Have a programmer doing some development in BPCS for me.  He has requested
that I move QTEMP to top of library list in the BPCS job descriptions so he
can test more conveniently.

Doesn't seem like it should hurt anything.....any comments out there?



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com 
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---