× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Hi Peter

Yes, we did do a Sizing questionnaire in conjunction with SSA and  spent a 
lot of time trying to get it right (not an easy task). We also spent some 
time discussing the sizing with IBM.

The company I am working for is in the mining industry which is very 
depressed at the moment, so they don't have money to burn. Since we can't 
afford an AS/400 with lots of reserve capacity, we can't make a mistake with 
the sizing.

I guess what we are looking for is some confirmation that the computer SSA 
recommends after crunching the questionnaire responses through the modeler 
is going to be somewhere near the mark.

We have contacted a few BPCS users ourselves (none of whom used a 720-2062) 
and the responses we got were mixed.

I appreciate your comment that no two sites are going to be the same, but we 
figured talking to a site with the same hardware/software config would at 
least give as an idea of what sort of workload it could handle.

Perhaps a better question may have been "How accurate is the BPCS sizer?".  
But even then, SSA could rightly point out that there is probably enormous 
variation in the accuracy of the responses to the sizer questions.

At the end of the day, I think you can only complete the sizer to the best 
of your ability, talk to some users, and then go with your experience and 
"gut feel".

Kind regards
Bob Godwin
Godwin Consulting
http://www.godwin.com.au
>From: pgreenfi@ssax.com
>Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
>To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
>Subject: RE: AS/400 Sizing
>Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 09:19:21 -0500
>
>Having been watching this string of messages I have to make a comment.
>
>If you are upgrading from an earlier release of BPCS to V6.x you need to
>contact your SSA or affiliate office to get a full explanation of the
>Sizing process you need to undertake.
>
>Making comparisons with other BPCS installations running the same version
>will not necessarily help unless the business you are comparing to has the
>same structure and level of transaction throughput as your own.
>
>Regards,
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>"Bob Godwin" <bob_godwin@hotmail.com> on 10/06/99 02:13:03 AM
>
>Please respond to BPCS-L@midrange.com
>
>To:   BPCS-L@midrange.com
>cc:    (bcc: Peter Greenfield/SSA/US)
>Subject:  RE: AS/400 Sizing
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Kusman
>
>We currently have a 500-2142 rated at 43.9 CPW.  We are planning to go to a
>720-2062(#1501) rated at 70/420 CPW with PCI bus, 1 gig of memory and 38
>gigs of disk.
>
>Regards
>Bob Godwin
>
> >From: Kusman Lim <KUSMAN@takeda-id.com>
> >Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> >To: "'BPCS-L@midrange.com'" <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
> >Subject: RE: AS/400 Sizing
> >Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:22:57 +0700
> >
> >Hi.. Bob & Luc
> >
> >Talking to AS/400 Sizing and performance. I am also in concerning. Bob,
> >Can you give me your specification of your 720-2162. I want to compare.
> >
> >We use BPCS C/S 6002plf cumMarch98 on AS/400. 9406 500 V3r7. Now have a
> >performance problem.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Kusman Lim
> >PT Takeda Indonesia
> >MIS Department
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bob Godwin [mailto:bob_godwin@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 9:37 AM
> >To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> >Subject: Re: AS/400 Sizing
> >
> >
> >Thanks for your comments Luc. Yes, we are aware that MM requires a lot
> >of
> >interactive CPW.  That's why we are opting for Interactive card #1501
> >which
> >has a CPW rating of 70, twice that of the base card (#1500). Hopefully
> >that
> >will be enough.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Luc.Debondt@am.pnu.com
> > >To: BPCS-L@midrange.com, "Bob Godwin" <bob_godwin@hotmail.com>
> > >Subject: Re: AS/400 Sizing
> > >Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 09:48:54 -0400
> > >
> > >   This is definitely NOT a good choice.  It would be a perfect machine
> > >   if you would have a BPCS C/S version, but for BPCS MM you need much
> > >   more interactive CPW.  With feature code #1501 you only have 35
> > >   interactive CPW.  You need a much higher feature code (= more money)
> > >   or a BPCS C/S version.
> > >
> > >
> > >______________________________ Reply Separator
> > >_________________________________
> > >Subject: AS/400 Sizing
> > >Author:  "Bob Godwin" <bob_godwin@hotmail.com> at Internet-America
> > >Date:    30/9/1999 17:43
> > >
> > >
> > >We are currently running BPCS V3.0.04 (and prototyping V6.0.04 MM) on
> >an
> > >AS/400 Model 500-2142, with V3R7.   SSA has advised us to upgrade to a
> > >Model
> > >720-2062 (Feature code#1501), with V4R4, before we go "live".  Is
> >anyone
> > >running BPCS V6.0.04MM on this model AS/400?  If so, could we phone you
> >to
> > >compare notes?
> > >Kind regards,
> > >Bob Godwin
> > >Godwin Consulting
> > >www.godwin.com.au
> > >
> > >______________________________________________________
> > >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> > >+---
> > >| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> > >| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> > >| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> > >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> >BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> > >| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> > >+---
> > >Received: from uspowmg32.uskzo.am.pnu.com ([146.240.200.97]) by
> >am.pnu.com
> > >with
> > >SMTP
> > >   (IMA Internet Exchange 3.11) id 00463C31; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 21:19:05
> > >-0400
> > >Received: FROM gateway.pnu.com BY uspowmg32.uskzo.am.pnu.com ; Thu Sep
> >30
> > >21:25:09 1999 -0400
> > >Received: from Kitten.mcs.com (Kitten.mcs.com [192.160.127.90])
> > >  by gateway.pnu.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA10336
> > >  for <LDEBONDT@am.pnu.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 21:22:54 -0400 (EDT)
> > >Received: from uucphost.mcs.net (Uucp1.mcs.net [192.160.127.93]) by
> > >Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id UAA29549; Thu, 30 Sep 1999
> > >20:23:31
> > >-0500 (CDT)
> > >Received: (from uucp@localhost)
> > >  by uucphost.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA29679;
> > >  Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:23:30 -0500 (CDT)
> > >Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> > >  by midrange.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA14694
> > >  for bpcs-l-outgoing; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:04:13 -0500
> > >Received: (from uucp@localhost)
> > >  by midrange.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id UAA14658
> > >  for BPCS-L@midrange.com; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 20:03:06 -0500
> > >Received: from hotmail.com (law-f165.hotmail.com [209.185.131.228])
> > >  by uucphost.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA27597
> > >  for <BPCS-L@midrange.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:44:21 -0500 (CDT)
> > >Received: (qmail 8904 invoked by uid 0); 1 Oct 1999 00:43:50 -0000
> > >Message-ID: <19991001004350.8903.qmail@hotmail.com>
> > >Received: from 203.57.219.67 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
> > >  Thu, 30 Sep 1999 17:43:49 PDT
> > >X-Originating-IP: [203.57.219.67]
> > >From: "Bob Godwin" <bob_godwin@hotmail.com>
> > >To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> > >Subject: AS/400 Sizing
> > >Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 17:43:49 PDT
> > >Mime-Version: 1.0
> > >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> > >Sender: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com
> > >Precedence: bulk
> > >Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> > >X-List-Name: BPCS Users Mailing List (BPCS-L@midrange.com)
> >
> >______________________________________________________
> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >+---
> >| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> >| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> >| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> >| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> >+---
> >+---
> >| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> >| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> >| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> >| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> >+---
> >
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>+---
>| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
>+---

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.