× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




CGI is kind of a "special snowflake" and not even IBM is behind it still.


CGI interfaces and their derivatives do fine in a pinch, when the workload
is small-scale and narrowly-scoped. They fail architecturally when
applications are broadly scoped, subjected to thousands of concurrent
users, require multiple runtime environments for say development, test, and
production or hosting many tenants on a single server.

One reason for this, is that architecturally you're combining socket I/O,
request routing, application framework code, application code, and DB code
in a single process, or a set of tightly-bound child processes. Under this
model it is possible to deploy one errant component which destabilizes the
whole shebang.

One solution to this problem is to stop running application frameworks and
applications in HTTP server jobs. Relegate the HTTP server to
communications. Use some form of inter-process communications to forward
client requests to essentially independent outside jobs for processing,
then returning responses to HTTP clients.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.