Re: Content-type issue with application/json and application/javascript

Hello Henrick. That's sort of what I suspected. Do I have to change the
CGI program to produce ASCII output, or is there a way to tell Apache to do
an EBCDIC to ASCII conversion on an "application/javascript" content type?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Henrik Rützou <hr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

apache converts ebcdic to utf-8 if the content type is text/... othervise
not.


On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Matt Lavinder <
mlavinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We have several CGI programs that generate javascript, usually JSON.

For

years we have set the content type to text/plain or text/javascript.

I'd

like to start using the more standard "application/json", but I am

hitting

a major snag. The output is garbage. I get the exact same output

when I

set the content-type to application/javascript.

Just to verify this was related to CGI output, I used AddType to change

the

content-type of static JavaScript files to "application/javascript".

Those

files look fine, so this must have something to do with it being CGI
output.

I don't really know what is up with the output, but I know it isn't
EBCDIC. It doesn't convert. Garbage in, garbage out. Changing the

content

type back to text/javascript sets everything right.

Anyone have any guesses what is going on here? We use CGIDEV2 under

IBM i

7.1. The default CCSID of our CGI jobs is 37.

Just so we are clear on one thing. We had the following settings in

our

HTTP Conf:

DefaultFsCCSID 037
CGIConvMode %%EBCDIC/EBCDIC%%

I commented both settings out and it had no impact on the output
whatsoever. All of our CGI programs that use content type of "text/*"
seemed to work. The ones using "application/javascript" or
"application/json" for content type still looked like garbage. The

only

guess I have is that mod_cgi sees that the content-type starts with
"application" and treats the output as binary, but I have no idea how I

can

tell mod_cgi to treat "application/javascript" as text, or if that is

even

the issue.

I am hoping someone has an idea. I know Apache pretty well, but this

one

has me stumped.

--
Matt
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400)

mailing

list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.

--
Regards,
Henrik Rützou

http://powerEXT.com <http://powerext.com/>
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.

--




*Matt Lavinder Programmer AnalystData Management Inc.Phone: (336)
573-5045Fax: (336) 573-5001*
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.