× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Mark, don't mean to send you to a website, but this might be the answer.

http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/error/report/1115150


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Mark <mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for the info. When we try to install the migration tool, we are
getting the following error: Application Migration Tool - Common Feature
3.5.2.v20130608_1226.

Do you have any suggestions for resolving this?

Mark

On 9/12/2013 1:00 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Send WEB400 mailing list submissions to
web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
web400-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WEB400 digest..."


*** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove all text
unrelated to your reply and change the subject line so it is meaningful.

Today's Topics:

1. WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express (Mark)
2. Re: WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express (Dean, Robert)
3. Re: WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express (Jim Oberholtzer)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:38:55 -0400
from: Mark <mark@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: [WEB400] WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express

We are working on upgrading our system from V5R4 to 7.1, and before we
can do that we need to upgrade WAS. We have never tried to upgrade WAS
before, so I was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions on
things we need to look for, especially when it comes to migrating our
applications.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark Brier's Email Signature


------------------------------

message: 2
date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:02:20 +0000
from: "Dean, Robert" <rdean@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express

If you have the source code for your applications, I would suggest
downloading IBM's migration toolkit and using it to see what issues you
will have.


http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/downloads/migtoolkit/config.html

As for the actual migration, the directions in the InfoCenter have
worked pretty well for us. If you've done anything more than basic
configuration changes, you'll want to double-check the values after the
migration.

If your application would support it, I'd recommend looking at a second
migration to WAS 8.5. For our applications and configuration, it's proving
to be very stable and fast.

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:39 PM
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WEB400] WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express

We are working on upgrading our system from V5R4 to 7.1, and before we
can do that we need to upgrade WAS. We have never tried to upgrade WAS
before, so I was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions on
things we need to look for, especially when it comes to migrating our
applications.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark Brier's Email Signature
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/web400.



------------------------------

message: 3
date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:30:08 -0500
from: Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] WAS Upgrade 5.1 Express to 7.0 Express

I concur with Robert's suggestion you go straight to WAS 8.5 Express.

Do be warned that in addition to the things Robert said, the packaging
in WAS 8.5 was changed quite a bit from earlier versions. The
documentation is at best extraordinarily poor, it's written as tough the
reader is already a subject matter expert rather than an ordinary user.
We found a complete reimplementation of the applications was needed,
although in our case we did not have to do much with code.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 9/11/2013 2:38 PM, Mark wrote:
We are working on upgrading our system from V5R4 to 7.1, and before we
can do that we need to upgrade WAS. We have never tried to upgrade WAS
before, so I was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions on
things we need to look for, especially when it comes to migrating our
applications.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark Brier's Email Signature
--

------------------------------


--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.