× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WEB400
  3. September 2011

Re: WAS Upgrade 6.1 or 7.0?

Already moving to the 32bit version. This application did not need the 64bit version anyway.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 9/8/2011 12:41 PM, Stefan Tageson wrote:
If you can't go to WAS 8, I would definitely go to WAS 7. WAS 6.x is
> based on Java EE 1.4 which is quite awful. Also WAS 6.1 uses Java 5
> which was EOL'd almost 3 years ago.
>
I agree. And don't forget to remember to switch to the j9 jvms (32 or 64bit) before the upgrade to i os 7.
I've been in trouble when going from v5r4 to i7 while still on 64 bit classic jvms.
Took some time in telephone with a gentleman from Rochester to sort things out afterwards.

Best regards

Stefan Tageson

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.