× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Den 15/12/10 13.24, Dean, Robert skrev:
That is incorrect itself.

The difference between what Oracle is doing and what Sun did is that Oracle actually went through with the charade of a JSR for Java 7. Sun avoided it due to the Apache situation.
That is not my understanding. It has been my understanding that the OpenJDK-transition delayed Java 7 so much that it got into the "now sell Sun" legal mess.
What Oracle has done doesn't make Java more or less commercial. It exposes the fact that the JCP is a façade.

JCP made sense in the Sun world. It doesn't in the Oracle world.


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:18 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] The ASF Resigns From the JCP Executive Committee

Saying anything but that Oracle has taken Java back as their own commercial product to the largest possible extend, would be incorrect.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.