× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You say time is money, but you use 64-bit Vista, which is generally
less compatible
with various hardware and software than the 32-bit edition without a
lot of upside.

Most modern hardware will support it just fine, the problem comes up
more when you want to use that old printer from 1998. I went 64bit when
I built my new machine a couple of months ago and don't regret it one
bit. Vista rocks when you have a machine that can handle it, and the
added memory space makes things hum. If I was to build/buy another PC it
would be 64-bit w/out a second thought.

Typically 64-bit software makes more sense on a server than on a
workstation.

Don't know about "more" sense. But yes, without a doubt, 64-bit in the
server space is the way to go. I'd argue that installing a 32-bit OS on
a server today is not only silly, but actually downright wrong.

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.