× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From: Nathan Andelin

Perhaps a few of  my observations about WDSC and EGL comes across as FUD,
but that's probably true  in any point/counter-point discussion.  I've
just been getting in to WDSC  lately, myself.  Colleagues in our local
users group have remarked about updates  destabilizing their PCs.

Again, please note time and date of these observations.  What version are
they on?  Have they been on this list?  Have they asked questions of other
WDSC users?

There were problems as WDSC evolved and while it's not bug-free today, it's
far advanced from where it was.  By the way... do you think Ruby is entirely
stable?  You might want to read a little about it.


 Perhaps if you  have enough memory and CPU it's not a problem.  That's
been the standard answer  for PC environments for a couple of decades.
But we may be entering an era  where less, instead of more, is better.

You think we will start using slower PCs with less memory and smaller disks?
I applaud you for a creative and interesting look at a possible future
world.  I wouldn't bet the farm on it, though.

Joe



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.