× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Mike,

I certainly don't thing that.  In fact, I don't think CIO's "hate" the
iSeries at all.    I just know, from being one and talking to them at
CIO get-togethers, the iSeries is RARELY spoken about at all.   

Many older CIOs remember the AS/400 if they've been around large/medium
IBM shops.  So they understand it; some more than others. 

Then comes the question of "Would it be appropriate they did speak
about it?".    Not usually from their perspective.  Currently, it just
doesn't fit in most CIO's Enterprise Architecture of the future as it
isn't seen to have a modern architecture comparable to the popular
platforms.  They see no compelling Value Statement.  

Could it be seen that way?   Yes, but the old way of doing things has
to change. 

Dave Odom

>>> MCUNNING@xxxxxxx 2/24/2006 14:57:16 >>>
please don't get the idea that all CIOs hate the iSeries or do not
understand it :)
 
 
Mike Cunningham
CIO
Pennsylvania College of Technology
www.pct.edu 
mcunning@xxxxxxx 

>>> meovino@xxxxxxxxx 2/24/2006 3:43:40 PM >>>

Dave,

If your CIO is willing to pitch a system that is giving users both the
functionality and speed that they want to go with something else, then
your CEO should be looking for a new CIO.

Mike E.

On 2/24/06, Dave Odom <Dave.Odom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> You are one of the very few that have responded to this that GET IT
and
> has done something to improve the image of the platform!!   And you
did
> it with the Presentation Layer which is the "wiz bang/blinking
lights"
> that most users and mangers see.  Kudos to you!!    However, the
back
> end technology IS looked at by lots of CIOs and the like and what
they
> see and hear is the iSeries is not even considered by the rest of
the
IT
> world to be a real RDBMS and it still uses the obscure (to them) RPG
> language.   So, perception is problem Presentation and Data Base
Layers.
>   I grant you the Presentation layer is a great place to start.
>
> Now if I can just get others to "see the light", follow suit and
turn
> around the perception.   But until that happens the platform's
> competitive status is in jeopardy.
>
> Take care,
>
> Dave
>
> >>> meovino@xxxxxxxxx 2/24/2006 12:21:57 >>>
> On 2/23/06, Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The truth is that most anything you can do in SQL outside of a few
> > vendor-specific extensions you can do on the iSeries.  And then,
when
> you
> > need extra performance, you can go to native I/O.  In fact, RPG is
> the only
> > language I know of that allows you to access your database both
ways,
> which
> > in my mind makes it leading edge!
>
> If we're worried about perception, why are we talking about back-end
> technologies?  The folks who are managing by in-flight magazine and
> making IT decisions are doing so because they believe that 5250 is
> dated technology (and I'm not going to debate the validity of this
> belief as I believe there are situations for both 5250 and GUI [and
I
> am my company's webmaster]).
>
> We are rewriting and enhancing a 5250 application (very little data
> entry, mostly inquiry, a great candidate for a GUI) using JSP/Java
> (running on WebSphere on iSeries) dealing with the iSeries back end.
> We have a mix of record level access and SQL, RPG program calls, and
> some MQT's mixed in for good measure.  Our users are going NUTS over
> this.  They are all telling us that they "did not know that the
AS/400
> could do this."  It's been able to do this for years; it's the IT
> staff that hasn't been able to do this (not enough web guys to put
on
> an internal project until now).  The users ASSUME the platform is
old
> and incapable because we are not producing the kinds of apps they
> want.
>
> We have all the tools we need to provide world-class GUI
applications.
>  If we can provide applications that meet or exceed user
expectations
> (both presentation and performance), we don't need to worry about
some
> knucklehead saying that we need to migrate to UNIX/Oracle or
> Windows/SQL Server or whatever.
>
> Mike E.
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
>
>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.