Re: Can CGI Do this ??? -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [WEB400] Can CGI Do this ???
From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:43:25 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> From: "Buck Calabro" <Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net>
> WDSc 4 has improved the speed a lot.  It's not as fast as
> 5250, but it is about as fast as other browser based applications
> (about 1 sec per panel.)

If 10 people pressed the <enter> key at the same moment, would the average
end-user response increase to 10 seconds?

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.