Re: To be under Indicators or not to be

Wow, this has been a great discussion!

Overall, the consensus seems to be to have Named Indicators appear under
Fields.

Would someone be willing to open an RFE for this?

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Simpson
Rational Developer for Power Systems Software
IBM Software Group - IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3226 (Internal: 313-3226)
Email: esimpson@xxxxxxxxxx



|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Jerry C. Adams" <midrange@xxxxxxxx> |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"'Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries'" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|09/26/2012 11:38 AM |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Re: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Sent by: |
|------------>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





I haven't read every reply so maybe someone else suggested making it a
"Preference" option. I realize that just doubled (at a minimum) the
programming effort involved. (And, personally, I would never give my users
such freedom.)

Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
Nobody notices when things go right.
--
A&K Wholesale
Home Office: 615-832-2730
email: midrange@xxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Koester, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:52 AM
To: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be

... where they can play with the pencils, while I fail to find named
indicators among the fields.

I agree with Gary about pre-defined indicators (and thanks for the
memories).
But as for the named indicators, my vote would be to have them with the
fields.

Thanks for asking, Edmund.

Michael Koester
~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gary Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:33 AM

I prefer to keep pre-defined indicators segregated; on the "group W

bench"
bench as it were.

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Edmund Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:36 AM
To: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] To be under Indicators or not to be

Ken's question about where in the Outline view to find named indicators has
stirred things up a bit.

We would like to know if there is a strong preference to move Named
indicators under the Fields heading so that all fields can be found in one
place and only predefined indicator usage being shown under the Indicators
heading.
On the other hand would anyone be upset about not finding the Named
indicators under the Indicators heading any more?

IBM is listening.


Regards,



Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development,
Rational
Developer for Power



--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.