× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I mostly use the verifier, too, although running WDSCi while using some of the
6.1 enhancements is growing annoying. Since the performance of our dev system
is pretty erratic, I continue to prefer the verifier anyway. If I could just
convince someone to shell out for an RDP seat...

Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries


----- Original Message ----
From: "Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, June 25, 2012 9:24:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Program verifier

From reading the other posts I must be the odd man out. I use verify a lot.
For me it is quick and accurate. Using the verifier is my preferred method of
identifying and eliminating coding errors. Once I have the errors taken care
of, then I compile.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.