MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » WDSCI-L » March 2008

Re: Is RDi really a "new" product?



fixed

Thank you for the link.

While it indicates that it can be plugged into a 3.2 workbench, the 3.3
distribution already includes it AND a Jetty container.

This is NOT simple stuff. While this may have help me awhile ago, 3.3
provided me with all of the stuff on the link. The only things my plug-in
had to extend were already in the supplied distribution. I'm not about to
rework my plug-in into two incompatible versions nor am I going to rework a
WDSC/RDi workbench when 3.3 has been GA since June of last year and 3.4 is
getting close.

Eclipse is free, RDi is not. RDi needs to offer value over what is free and
currently available as well as EVERYTHING in the free and current codebase.
IBM is intimately involved and even running most aspects of the 3.3 and 3.4
development efforts. For the prices charged, their "value added" packages
should always be up to date.

I do appreciate the link. I have no idea why it never popped up in all of
my googleling.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:49 PM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Is RDi really a "new" product?

Christopher Smith wrote:
Again, what specifically is required from 3.3?


Again, the Equinox wrapped Jetty servlet container. 3.2 does not provide
a workbench servlet container.

This isn't the project you're referring to?

http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/server/http_in_container.php

Joe





Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact