× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WDSCI-L
  3. March 2007

Re: Advanced vs. Standard

That's exactly what I'm talking about.  A good percent of programmers
are not even using WDSCi...

Thanks, James

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:02 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Advanced vs. Standard


Sounds like IBM will get  real earful at
the next Common conference from programmers.


Aside from the dozen or so active posters to this list, WDSCi is 
essentially unknown to RPG programmers.  Unless there's a secret 
underground of WDSCi users we don't hear from on this list, there won't 
be a long line howling about the AE situation.
   --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.