× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Actually, some IBM techs are working with me to see what's going on. We
COBOL folks aren't being left out in the cold. :-)
Kelly

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:03 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Problem with the verify.


   Kelly,

   This is a problem with COBOL verifies correct?  That's probably why some
   people don't report any problem with 512MB -- I'll bet they're verifying
   RPG.  That just leaves us COBOL folks out in the cold.

   Michael Quigley

   -----Original Message-----

   date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:03:17 -0500
   from: Chris Geist <cg.chris@xxxxxxxxx>
   subject: [WDSCI-L] Re: WDSCI-L Digest, Vol 2, Issue 289

   Subject: [WDSCI-L] Problem with the verify.

   Which version of WDSC are you using, I believe with WDSC v5.1 the
   cache issue has been resolved.  I don't have my PC with WDSC installed
   on it right now, but if you have v5.0 you can set the cache size to 0
   and it will no longer cache during the verify.  If you are still
   having problems with this it would be best to contact IBM iSeries
   support their LPEX developer will resolve this issue if there is a
   problem.

   ----- Earlier Message-----

   date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:33:25 -0400
   from: "Vitale, Daniel" <Daniel.Vitale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] Problem with the verify.

   I have 512 and I don't have any issue to verify anything....

   Daniel Vitale
   ----- Earlier Yet Message-----
   > date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:46:35 -0500
   > from: Kelly Cookson <KCookson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   > subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] Problem with the verify.
   >
   > Clearing the cache did not work. Thanks for the suggestion, though.
   Worth a
   > shot.
   >
   > We have a very definite pattern:
   >
   > All programmers running 1G RAM on Windows XP can verify ILE and OPM
   programs
   > of any size (that we have).
   >
   > All programmers running 512MB RAM on Windows 2000 can verify short
   (100-200
   > line) ILE programs no problem, short OPM programs with a 5-10 minute
   delay,
   > and no long programs.
   >
   > I'm assuming at this point the verify option basically does not work
   with
   > the IBM minimum accepted RAM and OS requirements.  Until I hear
   differently,
   > I'm going to tell the programmers with 512MB to avoid verify and simply
   > compile.
   >
   > Thanks,
   > Kelly

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.