RE: Client Access and Win 2000 (poor performance)

Frank,

I'm not sure what to say, I use WDSCi and Client Access on W2K every day,
and have had very good performance and reliability.  I don't think WDSCi
will even install to W98.  BTW, CPU consumption on the iSeries is not the
problem.  WDSCi consumes HUGE amounts of resources on you PC, both memory
and CPU cycles.  WDSCi runs best on  2+ Ghz with > 512MB ram.  I'm getting
on fairly well with 1.4Ghz @ 256MB....

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-898-7863 or ext. 1863



-----Original Message-----
From: Frank.Kolmann@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Frank.Kolmann@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:23 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WDSCI-L] Client Access and Win 2000 (poor performance)







I must beg to differ.  I have 2 PCs beside each other.
We are on an 825 V5R2 and I have up to date versions on CAE.
The 825 has more capacity then we use. It is not the cause.
The CPU usage mostly is <10% rarely goes to 60% (dual processor).
The CAE on Win2000 PC suffers periodic delays of about 1-3 seconds
, the same function on Win98 has negligible delay.
The delay is not consistant.  There will be say 3 or 4 good reponses
followed by the delay. It is very annoying and not an urban myth.

Frank Kolmann

>date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:03:44 -0500
>from: "Reeve" <news@xxxxxxxxxx>
>"Client Access has poor performance under Win2000"?  Not as far as I know
or
>have experienced; I think this is an urban legend.  Make sure you apply
the
>current CAX service pack.

_______________________________________________
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.