× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We are using a software called GOLD from a french / finnish company called 
Aldata. Web Site : www.gold-solutions.com The software has a version which 
also runs on Unix/Oracle.






Richard_Caldicott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent by: system21-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/14/04 07:10 PM
Please respond to
System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [SYSTEM21] JBA - INVENTORY MANAGEMENT : LOT CONTROL






Just out of interest, which warehouse system have you gone with?

Richard




DAhKow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: system21-bounces+richard_caldicott=tandybrands.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/14/2004 12:46 AM
Please respond to System 21 Users


To:     System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        RE: [SYSTEM21] JBA - INVENTORY MANAGEMENT : LOT CONTROL


Jeff,
I work with Guy and as he is not in the office this mornig, I'll
try to give you some of the why's of this required change.
We have using lot control in one of our -numerous- companies. This company

is a dealer in pharmaceutical products (drugs, equipment etc...) . In our
initial set-up a few years ago, lot control was one of their requirements,

to follow-up all those lot/batch numbers and expiry dates. Now we are
going to soon implement a warehouse management software (NOT JBA ) for
that company. There are obviously some issues there. Purchase and Sales
orders will originate from JBA and will be interfaced down to the
warehousing software. Similarly Receipts & despatches in the warehouse
must be fed back to JBA.
If you say that using lot control in JBA is a pain, imagine keeping the
two systems at par on a lot basis! Therefore the decision is to track lot
numbers & expiry dates only in the warehousing system. Updating to & fro
will certainly be a lot easier.
Fortunately we haven't any bespoke mods related to lot & batches. And
similarly to what you suggested, we were thinking about just clearing
INP80 records for that company, set back the lot-control flag to 'N' -all
this using SQL statements-  while verifying that INP80 & INP60 records
were in balance before. We wanted to know therefore whether this was a
safe approach and if there was any implications. We will certainly do some

tests here, as we do have a test company that we can play with.

Doing -ve adjustments to set back qties to zero, change the lot control
flag, and doing receipts to reinstate qties, would be difficult to do here

due to the large number of items and limited time availaible for that
exercise, though this would be the safest route.







"Jeff Klipa" <jklipa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: system21-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/13/04 05:53 PM
Please respond to
System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
RE: [SYSTEM21] JBA - INVENTORY MANAGEMENT : LOT CONTROL






Guy,

First, let me say that you'll be happier using 'N' instead of 'L' or
'B'...
Using Lot Control within JBA is certainly more challenging for the people
reporting the inventory movements.  I would always recommend NOT using Lot
Control if you don't absolutely have to.  That being said, it should be
far
less painless to go from Lot Control "ON" to Lot Control "OFF"...!!!

Second, I cannot give you the "full implications" of this change...  I
strongly suggest that you contact your GEAC support team if you have a
current maintenance contract.  I'll tell you what I think I know.

Any bespoke (custom) code you have in place should be reviewed to
determine
if there will be any impact there.  Also, if you are doing any bar code
scanning there may be an impact there as well.

If you have a test environment you should definitely take full advantage
of
it in this case...    Alternatively, you could nominate and change a few
"test" parts at a time to see what impact this will have on the data flow
and on the people in the operation...  You have the luxury of making this
switch gradually if you so choose.  You don't have to change all the parts
at once but you could.

The file that holds the lot balances, INP80, will need to be dealt with
for
sure.  You will want to remove the record from INP80 for all parts where
you
change lot control flag to "N"...  You must be sure that the integrity of
the stockroom balance in INP60 is preserved.  I am not sure if there are
any
other database considerations so I welcome any other comments...

Once the database changes are made your reporting of all inventory
movements
becomes much easier...

Just out of curiosity, what kind of commodity do you manufacture...?
Furthermore, why would you have been using lot control in the past and
suddenly not need to any more?

Good luck.

----Original Message Follows----
From: GGenevieve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jbausers-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SYSTEM21]   JBA - INVENTORY MANAGEMENT : LOT CONTROL
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:23:06 +0400





Hello All

We have been using Lot Control 'L' & Batch control 'B'. We now want
to change back to 'N'.
Can anyone tell if this is possible & what are the full implications?


Regards,
Guy Alain



_______________________________________________
This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.

_________________________________________________________________
Rethink your business approach for the new year with the helpful tips
here.
http://special.msn.com/bcentral/prep04.armx

_______________________________________________
This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.

_______________________________________________
This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.



_______________________________________________
This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list
To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21
or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.