× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Marvin

I thought this was an estimate only for the OPEN - much the same as SQLERRD(3) which is documented like this for the PREPARE -

For the PREPARE statement, contains the estimated number of rows selected. If the number of rows is greater than 2 147 483 647, then 2 147 483 647 is returned.

There've been other threads about this, and I think it has been said the only sure way to get row count is SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TABLE

Now I'm very happy to be mistaken here, because I'd love to have the simple answer from time to time, the SQLERRD(3) answer. Or the GET DIAGNOSTICS answer - oh, that array element IS updated with the number or rows retrieved with FETCH - useful for multiple-row fetches.

I do see that the documentation for DB2_NUMBER_ROWS says it IS the number of rows after an OPEN or FETCH, but with a SENSITIVE cursor it is an estimate. I see that default for SENSITIVE on a cursor is ASENSITIVE, so that what you get depends.

Any takers on whether the GET DIAGNOSTICS value is reliable for managing a loop? Under what conditions?

Regards
Vern

On 9/14/2015 2:43 PM, Marvin Radding wrote:
Mitch,

There is one method that would be a short cut. GET DIAGNOSTICs can provide the total number of records in the data set after the open. That can control the number of records fetched in the FETCH INTO statement.

After the open you can code:

/exec sql
GET DIAGNOSTICS :row_count = DB2_NUMER_ROWS;
/end


Marvin

------------------------------

message: 8
date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:17:00 +0000 (UTC)
from: Mitch Gallman <qtemp@xxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Loading arrayDS from sql select into statement?

I've used the following article several times as a reference: http://www.itjungle.com/fhg/fhg052009-story01.html
I've never had to do a select count prior to doing the fetch.
Mitch


On Monday, September 14, 2015 1:58 PM, "Koester, Michael" <mkoester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Charles,

Would be nice if you could use SELECT INTO along with FETCH FIRST XX
ROWS...
After getting the count (select count(*) into :resultCount from...), and declaring and opening a cursor, I can successfully use

? ? exec sql
? ? fetch MyCursor for :resultCount rows
? ? ? into :ArrayDS;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
But there apparently are no shorter shortcuts.

Michael Koester
Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. This message may also contain Protected Health Information (PHI) and must be treated confidentially and handled in accordance with HIPAA and other federal and state privacy laws. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail (and any accompanying attachments).


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.