× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Jon

I was thinking he could do this, too - question - is the ODP passed along, as well? That is, if we do a CHAIN, say, in one procedure and pass the file, is the position at what the CHAIN produced?

Cheers
Vern

On 11/21/2014 6:25 PM, Jon Paris wrote:
Alternatively pass the file to the subproc as a parm - that will make sure the same OVR is used.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On Nov 21, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Roger Harman <roger.harman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 on EXTMBR. Assuming you have the info readily available in your RPG to determine the member name, it's the way to go.



Roger Harman

COMMON Certified Application Developer – ILE RPG on IBM i on Power

OCEAN User Group<http://www.ocean400.org> – Vice-President, Membership (2014)



----------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:22:25 -0500
From: mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Issue with Override in sub procedure / RPGLE

Dutch:

Rather than using the OVRDBF command, look into using the ILE RPG IV
FILE-level keywords EXTFILE and EXTMBR -- These allow you to specify a
field to contain the qualified file name and a field to contain the
member name to use at "runtime" ... (at file OPEN time).

This way, you can have the local copy of the FILE in the procedure
working with the same member, or a different member ...

HTH,

Mark S. Waterbury

On 11/21/2014 2:50 PM, RPGLIST wrote:
I haven't run into this specifically before today, but I'm wondering what
a suitable solution would be.

I have an override on a multi-member file. In a sub-procedure I have the
same file declared locally that is adding and deleting some records, but
I've noticed that the file in the procedure is ignoring the override.

Is there a reason for this? I would have thought that since the OVRDBF is
at the program level (CLLE that calls the program) it would hold it for
the secondary declaration in the procedure.

Suggestions, in this particular case I need BOTH the mainline and the
procedure to use a specific member.

Dutch


--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.