× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Alan,

I appreciate "I think" but I was looking for more of a definitive answer.

Perhaps the "if not" is just a different instruction as "if" by itself.

Is this similar to asking: does "if a = b" take the same number of instructions as "if a <> b"?

Just wondering.

Thanks,

Glenn

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:38:02
To: RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: If boolean vs. If not boolean

If you mean machine instructions, the second would generate more to reverse
the value of logical true or false I would think.

Why would it matter? A couple of nanoseconds.




On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Glenn Gundermann <ggundermann@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi gurus,

Forgive the trivialness of this question but I am wondering if you smart
folks can answer this.

Compare these two statements:

If booleanVar;
If not booleanVar;

Do both of these take the exact same number of internal instructions for
the test or does the second statement take an extra step?

Thanks.

Glenn Gundermann


--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.