Re: CallP Versus Program 'CALL' -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: CallP Versus Program 'CALL'
From: Joe Pluta <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:29:05 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2/11/2013 12:57 PM, Buck Calabro wrote:

Caller and callee running in the same AG
LR on, variable: 239000
LR on, constant: 222000
LR off, variable: 229000
LR off, constant: 211000

This is the only one I have a problem with. I don't understand how *INLR on can achieve equivalent performance to *INLR off. That's some powerful mojo in that ILE.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: CallP Versus Program 'CALL' , Joep Beckeringh

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.