× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. February 2013

Re: CallP Versus Program 'CALL'

Buck,

You missed what seemed to me to be the most important takeaway - that
*both*types of call (procedure vs. program) are very,
*very* fast. To the point that unless you're talking about performing tens
of thousands of calls, it probably doesn't matter much *performance-wise* which
you do. At which point, you realize that performance is maybe less
important than maintainability, flexibility and coolness.

Rory

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think the only real takeaways here are that sub-procedure calls are
quite fast compared to program calls, and that it takes a fair amount of
time to create a new activation group. The system is pretty much
behaving the way we think it ought.
--buck




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.