×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Have a co-worker that is still defining ON/OFF as 1 byte character fields then coding *IN31 IFEQ ON...WHY? I really don't know.
Good Luck
Bill
(All in favour of saving gas, raise your right foot!)
________________________________
From: "Hiebert, Chris" <chris.hiebert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:28:59 AM
Subject: RE: %Parms Test Problem
--Anyway, I don't see the usage of *Zeros being unmodern (sic) or retro.
--Personally, I prefer *Zeros and *Blanks because they are easier to see
than
--0 or ' '.
I prefer never to see *Zeros. *Blanks is not as bad until a programmer
starts coding *Blanks inside CL programs because they are used to them.
Which, by the way, causes the field to contain the value '*Blanks'.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
