Re: commenting sub procedures -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: commenting sub procedures
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:56:50 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Comments lie...

Trust but verify...

Charles

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Jerry C. Adams <midrange@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

I can't say that I disagree. However, I have seen the opposite problem;
i.e., the program logic changes, but the documentation isn't changed. More
than once I have tried to make sense of a program in which I could see that
it was doing one thing, but the documentation said something different.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: commenting sub procedures , Joe Pluta
Re: commenting sub procedures , John McKee

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.