×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:00 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Jon, this scenario doesn't cause an error. (I didn't think it should,
but I tried it just in case.) It looks like the resolved system pointer
to the program is not related to the called program's activation group.
That's interesting ... I always believed that the invocation was tied to the AG.
I wonder how it does work then? I can't see how/why the situation is any different to the Service Program scenario. The SrvPgm problem arrises because there's nothing to tell the caller that it needs to reinitialize the proc ptrs because the original copy has gone away. So what causes the OPM program to re-resolve the pgm pointer? If it doesn't need to re-resolve then why is there a problem with srvpgms? It just seems that if it breaks in one scenario it should break in both.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
