× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



PRTSQLINF shows this:

SELECT CEMLADS INTO : H FROM CUSEMLAD WHERE CCUSNR = : H AND CEMLPPS = : H
SQL4021 Access plan last saved on 05/17/11 at 10:52:26.
SQL4020 Estimated query run time is 0 seconds.
SQL4017 Host variables implemented as reusable ODP.
SQL4008 Index CUSEMLA1 used for table 1.
SQL4011 Index scan-key row positioning used on table 1.
SQL4006 All indexes considered for table 0.



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Carel Teijgeler <coteijgeler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jeff,

Opening a cursor (and thus creating the result set)  has its effects on
performance, especially on large files. And you want to retrieve only one
at the time.
And because you use host variables for the selection you have to generate a
new result set each time.

Have you used PRTSQLINF to see what access plan is stored with this service
programme and what estimated time it requres to run the SQL statement.

With regards,
Carel Teijgeler

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 26-5-2011 at 14:35 Jeff Crosby wrote:

All,

I have a procedure in a service program to retrieve a single record field
(an email address) from a file.  The relevant statement in the RPG is:

Exec SQL
Select CEMLADS
Into :EmlAds
From CUSEMLAD
Where CCUSNR = :PxCust and CEMLPPS = :PxEmlPurpose;

I then return :EmlAds to the calling program.

To do this for about 2000 records takes upwards of a minute.  If instead I
define the file in the calling program and retrieve it via a
simple chain, these 2000 records are handled in 2-3 seconds.  Why the big
discrepancy?  If I run it in debug mode, it is using the access
path that already exists.  Is my SQL statement flaky?  Or is it the
overhead of calling the service program?  Combination?

If it makes a difference, about 80% of the time no record will be found.


--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.