× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2011

Re: Calling similiar (overloaded) procedure that has *nopass *omit inthe parameter

This is a stupid question, I'm sure, but... If you are using the "overloading" paradigm (albeit, with diff names for the procedures), why the heck are you using *NOPASS and *OMIT?! Seems to me they are two different paradigms for solving the same problem.

On 3/8/2011 1:07 PM, hockchai Lim wrote:
ok. A big select statement is what I've being doing. Just want to make
sure that there isn't any latest greatest technique that I might have
missed. The real proc1 and proc2 actually have 16 *nopass/*omit parameters.
Is going to be ugly...

Note: Parm1 is not a concern. That is just an example.

thanks


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.