× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Simon,
I think you hit the nail on the head. I would suspect that the reason why
the US uses MMDDYYYY is because we say it as.. December 15th, 2009. So
people here write their dates 12/15/2009 because that is how they say it
in their heads. It then translated over into the computer world where
these dates must now be stored.

Does the rest of the world say 15th December, 2009?


Thanks
Bryce Martin
Programmer/Analyst I
570-546-4777



Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
12/15/2009 02:31 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: Date formats







On 15/12/2009, at 11:53 PM, Glenn Hopwood wrote:

If you use numeric fields for your dates I think mmddyy has a more
'natural' sort then ddmmyy.

Only true within a given year. As soon as your dates span multiple
years any so-called sort using MMDDYY is messed up (unless you WANT to
group the same months together). Of course, DDMMYY is effectively
unsortable anyway so I suppose there's a weird logic that MMDDYY is
somehow better than DDMMYY.

The only sensible numeric date formats for a database field is
YYYYMMDD, CYYMMDD if you're strapped for space), or a day number from
a given reference point (hopefully further back than 1900-01-01).

With the database using a Scaliger number to represent dates the
visual format no longer matters as much although I think database date
fields should be *ISO. Convert them for display or print purposes.

I never understood why MMDDYY became so popular in the US. That
sequence of month number, day number, and year only makes sense when
written in text form (e.g., November 11, 1918) or when spoken (e.g,
August Fourteenth, Nineteen Forty Five). Even so, to many of us in the
rest of the world that's still an odd format and the day of the month
of the year (e.g., 2nd September, 1945) is more natural.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.