× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Comments in-line Nathan.

On 27-Jun-09, at 1:00 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Well, presumably the legacy compilers don't require much R&D.

That do require some work but admittedly not as much as the new ones.
But that's not the point.  Applying your logic the legacy compilers
should cost only 10% or so (if not less) of the price of the current
ones - but that's not how it is. Pricing is used for many things, and
particularly in the computer industry rarely has much to do with cost.
Pricing can, and should, be used to encourage people to upgrade.  All
the current pricing does is encourage management to stay in the past.

What computer company other than IBM charges for its compilers? The
MSFT C# and VB compilers are part of the Windows OS ( or .NET
framework ). With the compiler built into the OS, you can write apps
which compile and run code on the fly. .NET has some nice classes that
do that.

If IBM cant afford to maintain its compilers, I suggest they open source them.

-Steve

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.