× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The biggest advantage to me is I can define a parameter as CONST and the
compiler will actually enforce it in my code. I can't "accidentally"
modifiy the parameter's contents and send it back to the caller.

Brian May
Project Lead
Management Information Systems
Garan, Incorporated
Starkville, Mississippi

Young i Professionals
http://www.youngiprofessionals.com



Jerry Adams <Jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
04/15/2009 09:47 AM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: *entry and PR with same program as EXTPGM






Chamara,

In the situation you illustrated, the ExtPgm( ) isn't really required. But
obviously doesn't cause any problems. As Adam (I think) said, the PR
definitions should be in a copy book somewhere. So in the copy book the
ExtPgm( ) keyword makes sense since it may be a candidate for inclusion in
another program that calls this one.

I don't know for a fact, but I doubt there is any advantage in using
either method to define the parameters (*Entry list). My bet is that it's
the PI structure that defines the PList and that the PR is just along
(syntactically) for the ride. If that's true (big IF), the compiler will
generate the same code for both.

The "advantage" is in the eye of the beholder. Like someone else said, I
hated using PList when I moved to free format. When Jon told me about
this method at a COMMON session, I jumped on it because, well, it just
looks neater.

Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chamara Withanachchi
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 8:00 AM
To: RPG Programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: *entry and PR with same program as EXTPGM

Hi all,

Can someone clarify me what is the different between *ENTRY and coding a
procedure as the same name of the program and using EXTPGM keyword

Ex;

Abcpgm pr extpgm('ABCPGM')
Parm1 10a

Abcpgm pi
Parm1 10a



Regards,

Chamara Withanachchi
IBM Certified Power System Expert
RPG Programmer
(owner of www.rpgiv.info)

WWW.RPGIV.INFO
Mob: +971 50 5698644
Tel: +971 6 5595887
chamaraw@xxxxxxxxxx
www.rpgiv.info
i want to be future ready. i want control. i want an i.


Sent from my BlackBerry(r) wireless device

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.