×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Happy new year Simon!
Would you care to elaborate on your reply which seems to put some doubt on the other responses to James' post?
I don't have time to go reading up on FIFO, LIFO, FCFO in the DDS and I'm sure that a lot of us would benefit from your reply.
Thanks.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Simon Coulter
Envoyé : samedi 10 janvier 2009 06:31
À : RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Objet : Re: Uncertain on CHAIN vs. SETLL/READE
On 10/01/2009, at 12:10 PM, James Lampert wrote:
I know that a SETLL with only the leading keyfield, followed by a
READE with that same keyfield, is guaranteed to come back with the
first record with that leading key.
But is that also true of a CHAIN with just the leading keyfield?
The action of both keyed reads will depend on the use of FIFO, LIFO, FCFO in the DDS.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
