×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I'm being dense and missing something here. I understand the danger of
LVLCHK(*NO). What I was describing was how I have added fields to a
*production* file on the fly without getting any level check errors. I
*have* to do step 2, the CHGPF statement, so that the new fields I put
into the DDS source are actually put into the file. *Because* I have
done that CHGPF statement and therefore added fields, any RPG programs
will level check, *except* I put a LVLCHK(*NO) in that CHGPF statement.
Now I compile the RPG programs using that file. Since they now reflect
the new, updated version of the file, I can now do a CHGPF LVLCHK(*YES).
I am not at all concerned about LVLCHK for the compiles, I am concerned
that a user will execute one of these RPG programs before I complete the
compiles. Murphy's law says that if I only need to compile 3 programs,
and it takes less than 20 seconds total (which it would), someone will
call one of these programs in that 20 seconds. That's all.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
