× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Barbara,

<snip>
EXTNAME and LIKEREC have exactly the
same functionality except that LIKEREC doesn't allow you to add more
subfields. But that's not really a feature, since if you add more
subfields to the EXTNAME structure, the original subfields still exactly
match the I/O buffer.
</snip>

Plus you can't really call it a "feature" if it allows less functionality
than an alternative, can you. Surely you call it a "limitation"... :-)

So are EXTNAME and LIKEREC basically implemented in the same way under the
covers?

Scott pointed out that doing an explicit read into a LIKEREC DS simply moved
the record buffer, whereas doing an implicit read into an EXTNAME DS did a
field-by-field move, but is that the only difference (under the covers)?

Rory


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.