× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



        I Agree Buck.  For our internal systems, looking back at some code I
wrote 20 years ago, it seems that careful use of hard coding is actually
easier to maintain than a set of inter-related tables - and the program for
maintaining it is already there (wdsci/seu/whatever). Where some of my more
recent table driven applications either require a considerable coding effort
to write maintenance programs or become a 'what was that table name? And
which ones are related?' dig through docs/memory/code to determine, so
changes can be made.  I guess as usual there is no right answer except what
works for your situation best...

Regards,

-----Original Message-----
 On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:52 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Legacy question


I think that in general, vendors tend to be more interested in table 
driven systems than companies writing software for their own consumption.
   --buck


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.