× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. October 2006

RE: Workaround for 32767-byte and 32767-element limits?

Not really....  Just process the space in 32K chunks.  This is usually done via 
pointers.  

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-297-2863 or ext. 1863



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James H H Lampert
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:18 AM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Workaround for 32767-byte and 32767-element limits?


Is there a workaround for the 32767-byte limit on the 
length of a character standalone field or DS subfield, 
and/or the 32767-element limit on arrays?

I'm asking on behalf of a colleague, and I don't fully 
understand myself what the purpose is here, but I believe 
they are to be used as some sort of communication buffer.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.