× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Could it be that the old versions of those service programs are still activated 
into some of your jobs on the host?  Simply creating a new service program with 
a *REPLACE option will not force the old service program out of memory for jobs 
that had previously activated the old service program.  Those jobs would need 
to be ended and restarted before the new service program objects would be 
loaded....

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-297-2863 or ext. 1863



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Eric Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:34 AM
To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: Service programs compiled incorrectly


Steve,
I have tried everything that I can think of to resolve the problem.

maybe CRTPGM was used to recreate the bombing programs after the
SRVPGM was created with EXPORT(*ALL) and before it was created with
the binding source.
After I recreated the service programs correctly with new signatures, I
recreated the programs using CRTRPGMOD and CRTPGM.

start with the error message. If it is a signature violation, display
the help text and find the name of the service program it is
complaining about. You can use DSPPGM to see what signature the
program is expecting for each SRVPGM it references.  And you can use
DSPSRVPGM to see the signature of the service program. However the
signatures got the way they are, they have to match.
It is not a signature violation - it is having a problem with some of the
modules - getting bad data.  For example, a module RTVCUSMAS is supposed to
get a record from the customer master record. 


depends on the error message. As long as you have not changed the
order in which the MODULE modules and BNDSRVPGM srvpgms are specified
there should not be a problem.
I only added a module to the end of the binder source.  In the case of the
service programs with some duplicate modules, I removed the duplicates,
recreated those service programs and bound them with the service program
that had the other required modules.

Eric


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.