× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I think in IBMs case, they tend to write-off the development of something for
tax purposes and hence destroy that material. Take the port of DDS and RPGIII to
OS/2 during the SAA days. Even though they created it, they wrote it off and it
will never see the light of day. Certainly this is different from there being
millions of people using the software but the effect is the same--writing it off
means it gets destroyed.

-Bob Cozzi
www.iSeriesTV.com
Ask your Manager to watch iSeriesTV.com


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve Richter
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:30 AM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: Jakarta POI - HWPF for word files

On 8/10/06, AGlauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx <AGlauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bob,

you wrote on 10/08/2006 10:29:47 AM:

This is often the case with this "free" software. Most of the time,
people are
doing it in the spare time, however frequently the unemployed (i.e.,
recent grad
students) are doing it to play in the sandbox and to get their resumes
out
there. Odds are the "Maintainer and Main contributor" probably took jobs
at
Google.
This is the risk you take in using this opensource/free software.

I agree that this is a risk.  In the case of the POI HSSF subproject, it
is widely used enough that the chances of it being abandoned seem low. The
HWPF subproject seems to have been low on interest for its entire
lifespan, so its abandonment probably shouldn't come as a surprise.


While it is true that some free/libre open source software (FLOSS)
projects are the pet projects of one person, I don't think it's fair to
paint all FLOSS with the same brush.

do FLOSS projects not allow commercial enterprises to sell FLOSS
derived code? I dont need a legal opinion, it is just my impression
that if you sell FLOSS derived code you have to allow the buyer to
copy and distribute your add on as well as the FLOSS code base. If so
that would be a disincentive for a commercial enterprise to pick up an
abandoned FLOSS project.  ( but I guess the same is true for
commercial software. When IBM cut and ran from OS/2 it did not open
source it and its users were left stranded. bad precedent for i5/OS! )

-Steve

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.