× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Not to get into an argument (about the past no less), but the AS/400 was a
complete break from the S/38.  If it wasn't, the could have left the OBJ.LIB
syntax in place, but instead they went with lib/obj with an obvious eye
towards the IFS that didn't get implemented for many years.

No, the fact that the AS/400 was so radically different and yet still
supported nboth S/36 and S/38 modes was something of an engineering miracle.
Unfortunately, some folks have let that miracle drag on a bit too long, and
with IBM's strategy of trying to get people to newer releases, you had to
see the writing on the wall.

Joe

> From: Jim Franz
> 
> It had the new "native as400" which was mostly modernized 38 with
> some 36 concepts included.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.