× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joel Cochran
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:59 AM
> To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
> Subject: RE: TEST Date in free form
> 
> 
> 
> Let's say we encounter a date that is neither *USA or *USA0: these are
> the operations that must happen to finally resolve the error:
> 
> 1. TEST(DE) the format for *USA
> 2. Check for an error condition. (FOUND)
> 3. TEST(DE) the format for *USA0
> 4. Check for an error condition. (FOUND)
> 5. Assign default value.
> 
> With monitor, you have the following:
> 1. Try to assign as *USA. (FAILS)
> 2. Try to assign as *USA0. (FAILS)
> 3. Assign default value.
> 
> A 5-3 ratio! For 100,000 records, even if all of them were poorly
> formatted, that's 500,000 operations vs. 300,000.
> 
> Now assume a record with valid *USA:
> 
> 1. TEST(DE) the format for *USA
> 2. Check for an error condition. (NOT FOUND)
> 3. Assign *USA value.
> 
> vs.
> 
> 1. Assign *USA value.
> 
> Now it's a 3-to-1 ratio!
> 
> Now assume 100,000 records with 75,000 bad formats and 25,000 
> with *USA:
> 
> TEST(DE):
> 5 x 75,000 = 375,000
> 3 X 25,000 = 75,000
> TOTAL = 450,000 Operations.
> 
> MONITOR:
> 3 x 75,000 = 225,000
> 1 x 25,000 = 25,000
> TOTAL = 250,000 Operations.
> 
> So even with 75% bad formats, you still do much much better 
> with MONITOR
> than TEST(DE).
> 

Joel,

While I agree with your number of operations calcs, if you're really looking at 
performance you need to take into account the amount of time each operation 
takes.  Five quick operations could easily beat 3 long ones.

As I understand it, one of the most expensive operations is throwing an 
exception (in any language).

Thus, if you expect a lot of invalid data, it makes sense to do the test (DE) 
before trying the conversion.

In a quick test, doing 100 test(de) on a bad date took .04s whereas using 
monitor around the attempted conversion of the bad date took .145s.

That's over a 300% performance decrease. 

HTH,
Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.