Re: Chain doesn't set %EOF

Joe Pluta wrote:
> ...
> I understand the thinking that %EOF and %FOUND are different.  How about
> a new BIF that does what we want?  Like %DATA.  If a CHAIN *or* a READ
> are successful in putting data into the buffer, then %DATA is true.  We
> could then do this:
> 
> Chain ( SomeKey ) File;
> DoW %Data( File );
>    // do something
>    ReadE ( SomeKey ) File;
> EndDo;

Your "%DATA" doesn't really fit with SETLL and SETGT, but I think any
new "continue-io-loop" builtin should.

But you can already use a single builtin function for both CHAIN and
READ.  EOF and record-not-found have non-error statuses of 00011 and
00012; a status of zero means it's ok to continue processing the file.

Chain ( SomeKey ) File;
DoW %Status( File ) = *zero;
   // do something
   ReadE ( SomeKey ) File;
EndDo;