× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.





numeric_date = %int( %char( date_field: *cymd)) + 19000000;


Sorry if I'm confused, but why would you want to do this? Wouldn't it make more sense to have the following?


         numeric_date = %int( %char( date_field : *iso0) );

It just seems to me that hardcoding 19000000 is a bad idea when you can easily get that information from the system. If you ever need to handle dates later than 2899 (not that that's very likely) you'll have to change every single program, just like we did with Y2K.

I know, we'll all be dead & gone by then. But why hard-code a century when it's actually LESS code to do it properly? That's the part that I don't understand.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.