× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yes there is a better way...
I will only tell you the answer, however, after you send me a diagram
illustrating how, in the figure below, to connect the top row of 3 dots with
the bottom row of 3 dots using a line drawn with a pen or pencil WITHOUT
ever allowing any of the lines to intersect. This has to be accomplished on
a two-dimensional surface. You have ten minutes... Go!

  *          *          *


  *          *          *



-Bob Cozzi


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Paul Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:27 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RPG read loops

Almost all of the code in the current Leave / Iter thread showed a loop
like:

DoU F3 or F12
   exfmt
   If Not (F3 or F12)
      //  do something
   EndIf
EndDo

This only has one exfmt statement inside a DoU loop.  A similar file read
loop would be:

DoU %EoF
   Read
   If Not %Eof
      // do something
   EndIf
EndDo

which has one read statement inside of a DoU loop.  Isn't there a better way
of coding loops with more than one read/exfmt like:

exfmt
DoW Not (F3 or F12)
   //  do something
   exfmt
EndDo

or

Read
DoW Not %Eof
   // do something
   Read
EndDo

or

SetLL
ReadE
DoW Not %Eof
   // do something
   ReadE
EndDo

Most programmers seem to code with the single read/exfmt style which IMHO
complicates the code.  In a DoU/Read loop the body of the loop is nested two
deep inside the DoU and an If statement.  In a Read/DoW/Read loop the body
of the loop is nested one deep inside a DoW.  Doesn't this reduction in the
nesting of the body of the loop improve the program?  Readability is
improved.  Performance is also improved (although minor) with the removal of
one test against the end of loop.

Other programmers I work with are adamant about not coding more than one
read statement.  Why is coding more than one read statement such a problem?

Paul

-- 
Paul Morgan
Senior Programmer Analyst - Retail
J. Jill Group
100 Birch Pond Drive, PO Box 2009
Tilton, NH 03276-2009
Phone: (603) 266-2117
Fax:   (603) 266-2333



-- 
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.