× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Kurt,
 
<snip>
In regard to the Export/Import feature, maybe if IBM allowed us to
specify the Const keyword along with the Export keyword, then subsequent
modules would have access to the value w/o being able to change it (much
like procedure calls).
</snip>
 
I suppose that would be nice. It would give us the ability to have read-only
access to data items in other modules. I suppose the benefit there would be
the fact that the import/export is still within the program object. I can't
imagine that it would be easy to do though. The data in all copies would
have to be updated every time the value was changed in the originating
module. This is easy when each import simply references the address of the
export. Not so easy when they're all copies.  
 
<snip>
While I have used encapsulation, I think if the Export/Import feature
were further expanded upon, it'd be a really nice tool.
</snip>

The use of data item imports/exports AND encapsulation via sub-procs could
hold a partial solution:
 
You could have a scenario where you can import/export your data items
accross modules within the same (service) program object, but not beyond.
Then, for all data items that need to be exported beyond the service program
object you would create getter sub-procs.
 
You know, I'm still not sure about the idea of modules exporting data items,
even to other modules within the same program object. It seems to me that
modules should be re-usable, and having a module that has explicit imports
from other modules seems to fly in the face of that. However, I am willing
to be convinced. I mean, I can see the use of generic imports in a utility
module, that allows the behaviour of the module to change depending upon the
other modules it is bound to (resolving it's imports to a variety of module
exports).
 
Maybe the real solution would be the ability to specify the level of export
for a sub-proc or data item. Something like:
 
EXPORT - the current value, and the default
EXPORT(*PGM)
EXPORT(*SRVPGM)
EXPORT(*ACTGRP)
EXPORT(*JOB)
EXPORT(*BND) - same as EXPORT  
 
Hmmm...
 
Food for thought.
 
Larry Ducie

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.